Comments for Free Law Information Blog

Comment on The Duties Of Legal Assistants by Derrick Jameson

Derrick Jameson — Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:29:42 +0000

Sounds like a good job to me.

Comment on Whistleblower Protection Act by colts86whitesox

colts86whitesox — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:29:58 +0000

I work for a private college, where our salary is based a monthly enrollment budget. In a few months, a new performance assessment will start where there will not be anymore budgets, but a eSCORE based on how we do interviews,calls,etc. During our team huddle, my director keeps telling us that we should start updating our resumes, start looking for other employment, what is our motivation to continue to work there because she rehire us based on how we are performing. She says all this in a mean,arrogant voice. We all feel that we are being threatened on being fired or doing this so that we can resign and not collect unemployment. Can EEOC get involved in this and can we win the case? Please help!

Comment on Document Safekeeping by Jan van der Linde

Jan van der Linde — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:48:57 +0000

Is the origenal borrowing document always being kept by the lender and in terms of what law.

Thanx

Comment on Claiming Injury Compensation by SHyne

SHyne — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:58:45 +0000

How do I write a Summary Judgement for my worker Comp trail is there a site I can go to, so I could have a idea of what I’am doing

Comment on Whistleblower Protection Act by Roslyn Holman

Roslyn Holman — Fri, 30 May 2008 21:05:38 +0000

In 2005, I was wrongfully terminated for filing a racial and unequal pay practice discrimination Complaint with EEOC in 2001 (because I was an ideal employee, the resignation of a supervisor was the first opportunity for retaliation). EEOC failed to justify dismissing my Complaint without investigation; I was issued a Right to Sue Letter.

My former employer falisified inadequate reduction-in-force documents (generated after my termination to respond to EEOC Complaint) that consisted on a proposed reduction-in-force (due to lack of funding) that was unsigned and on plain paper and did not correspond to my termination letter. I submitted evidence that at time of my termination the State budget was being publicized with a recommended increase in funding. Subsequent to my termination, the Defendant received the increase.

The increase in the state budget was publicized on the internet and Defendant’s website.

Due to time constraints, the lawsuit was filed pro se. Although, I had some problem dealing with Defendant’s attorney unresponsiveness, everything was moving along. I knew I had a solid case supported by substantial evidence.

Defendant’s documents are verifiably inconsistent fabrications.

Two months before jury selection and projected trial date (12/1/2006), the magistrate judge entered into a conspiracy with the defendant’s attorney and inappropriately used summary judgment to dismiss my case. My pertinent evidence was either misrepresented or suppressed and defendant’s inconsistent fabricated documents were supressed. Without applying law to facts or Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c), defendant was granted summary judgment and although I had filed a cross motion for summary judgment, my motion was denied without being addressed and my case was dismissed with any justification.

The Court of Appeals covered up the District Court indiscretion and without reason or law “Affirmed.” I’m now is the process of preparing a Writ of Certiorari for the U.S. Supreme Court.

My Question is, “Who’s going to protect “Title VII Retaliation victims” from discrimination in the judicial system.

Comment on Whistleblower Protection Act by Johnny Graham

Johnny Graham — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:10:17 +0000

My situation is that I am in a contract which seems to be pretty much bogus and misleading thats one thing but here is another, I am supposed to get paid for training new drivers such pay I never got, also get paid for breakdowns when the truck is out of service, for three days of breakdown I never got paid, money was taken out of my payroll to pay overweight tickets twice that the company should have paid, for a total of
$615.00. we are having a meeting on 4/19/08 and I’m speculating that it’s about the contract and them manipulating our escrow money and trying to convert us to company drivers. Their are approx. 17 drivers that are independent contractors, some of us have put in thousand of dollars in these trucks, I believe this is a whistleblower. HELP US SOMEONE!!!!!